Date

Sep. 30. 2023

Shaping the Story - Media Guidelines for Reporting on Child Sexual Abuse

Date

Sep. 30. 2023
Shaping the Story - Media Guidelines for Reporting on Child Sexual Abuse

Journalists have great power to bring public health issues such as Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) and Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) into societal awareness. But with great power, comes great responsibility. Preventing further harm and revictimisation to the victims should always be the priority when reporting on cases of exploitation and abuse. Reporting on child sexual abuse should empower survivors to disclose abuse while simultaneously raising awareness of the issue among the general public.

To ensure that our public response to CSAM, is appropriate, respectful and helpful we must continue to advocate that everyone involved follows the best practices outlined in our CSAM Media guidelines. Only by using harmonised terminology guidelines can we ensure that our approach to raising awareness and fighting CSAM is genuinely global. Not using a consistent structure in addressing this topic leads to miscommunication, and can complicate the harmonisation of legislation.

Promoting Prevention Instead of Fear

The crimes some children have to experience are unimaginable, but framing stories to evoke fear is not helpful. It does not support the victim nor create a clear picture of the wider societal issue. To avoid fearmongering, frame your story in a way that helps people form a clear picture of how and why children are suffering, and how adults can help. Providing solutions and helpful resources can give your story a more positive outlook.

Thematic vs Episodic Storytelling

Both thematic and episodic storytelling has merit, but it is critical to find a balance. CSA is not isolated; reporting on individual cases also has to acknowledge the broader societal issue. While isolated stories can be impactful and empower survivors, always make sure to include contextual information.

Tackling Stereotypes

Everyone can be a victim or survivor of sexual violence. While statistics show that some demographics are more vulnerable to abuse than others, anyone regardless of gender, societal background, race, religion or ethnicity can be targeted for abuse. Similarly, the same applies to offenders. We must remember that anyone regardless of age, gender or background can be a perpetrator.

Sexual vs Factual Descriptions

When reporting cases of child sexual abuse (CSA) and child sexual abuse material (CSAM) avoid including graphic or sexualised descriptions. Graphic details do not benefit the survivor and might even lead to revictimization and re-traumatisation of the victim.

Attributing Responsibility to the Perpetrator

When reporting stories of abuse, the blame must always be on the perpetrator, not the victim. Make the offender the subject of sentences and the victim/survivor the object. This way you assign the responsibility to the perpetrator and not the child. Whether a victim was attractive, had previous sexual relations with the perpetrator, engaged in risky behaviour, dressed provocatively, or had a lot to drink, the responsibility and blame for a sexual assault lie with the person who perpetrated the offence.

Individual Issue vs. Societal Issue

Media outlets and journalists can help audiences understand that child abuse and neglect are not simply the result of individual failure or family dynamics but a public health issue. It is critical to provide relevant societal context and to promote prevention on a societal level.

Being Sensitive instead of Sensationalist

All sexual abuse is violent. Graphic details and descriptions of injuries do not add to the story and only revictimize the survivors. Do not sensationalise child sexual abuse as it distorts understanding of the broader issue, spreading fear without support or solution.

A Balanced Story vs Victim Blaming

The language in your report on CSA should leave no room for interpretation on who is to blame for the abuse. It is always on the person who committed the crime, and never on the victim or survivor.

An Individual's Right to Privacy vs. Public Record

Even if some information may be accessible, that does not mean it should be publicised. Consider the impact on the victim before making any personal information about them public. Make sure to protect their privacy by not providing identifying features of the victim. This can make them more vulnerable to future victimization and create feelings of shame, which could impact recovery for the individual and discourage others from reporting cases.

Survivor vs. Victim

Some individuals prefer the term victim, as it accurately reflects that a crime was committed against them. Others identify more strongly with the term survivor, which emphasises resilience and life beyond the abuse. Preferences vary and may change over time, so sensitivity to this nuance is essential.

Child Abuse Material vs Child Pornography

The term child pornography fails to describe the true nature of the material and undermines the seriousness of the abuse from the child’s perspective. Pornography is a term primarily used to describe material depicting adults engaged in consensual sexual acts distributed for the purposes of sexual pleasure. Using this term in the context of children risks normalizing, trivialising and even legitimising sexual abuse and exploitation.

If you or your organisation covers any of the topics outlined above, you should download our CSAM Media guidelines that outline best practices in reporting on CSAM. Do you have any questions, or concerns or want to propose additions to these guidelines? You can contact us anytime at communications@inhope.org.

Cookies



This website requires the use of cookies to function properly. To learn more, please refer to our cookie policies.